Reading the repo — stats and the shipped feed land in about ten seconds…
The team addressed several template-related issues this week, including fixes for template version offsets and pipeline template handling. API permission checks were tightened, and various edge cases in pipeline execution and configuration were resolved to improve overall stability.
Get this in your inbox every Monday →A deterministic 0–100 hygiene score — README, license, CI, tests, docs, and freshness.
Who ships this repo — author concentration and the bus factor across the last 300 mainline commits.
How welcoming this repo is to contributors — issue throughput, close time, responsiveness, and good-first-issue count.
What this project is built on — dependency count by ecosystem, the license mix, and anything worth a legal look before you adopt it.
Whether this project's CI can be trusted — pass rate, run times, flaky runs, and which workflow is the weak link.
Grounded in bk-ci's README, structure, and recent commits — answers won't invent code they haven't seen.
A Monday email with what shipped, in plain English — no account needed.
Showing raw commit titles for the newest commits. Sign in to generate AI summaries.
Merge pull request #13694 from fcfang123/bug-template-version-offset-13686
Merge pull request #13680 from carlyin0801/issue_13679_api_permission_fix
A floor, not a guess: counts only commits whose author, co-author trailer, or message explicitly credits an AI tool (Claude, Copilot, Cursor, aider, Codex…). Based on 30 mainline commits. Unattributed AI code isn't counted here — the full audit estimates that separately.
