Reading the repo — stats and the shipped feed land in about ten seconds…
A deterministic 0–100 hygiene score — README, license, CI, tests, docs, and freshness.
Who ships this repo — author concentration and the bus factor across the last 300 mainline commits.
How welcoming this repo is to contributors — issue throughput, close time, responsiveness, and good-first-issue count.
What this project is built on — dependency count by ecosystem, the license mix, and anything worth a legal look before you adopt it.
Whether this project's CI can be trusted — pass rate, run times, flaky runs, and which workflow is the weak link.
Grounded in skills's README, structure, and recent commits — answers won't invent code they haven't seen.
A Monday email with what shipped, in plain English — no account needed.
Showing raw commit titles for the newest commits. Sign in to generate AI summaries.
Update claude-api skill: managed-agents-onboard from a quickstart name or a URL (#1962)
Update claude-api skill: Claude Opus 5.5 default, Claude Sonnet 5.5, build-eval and hillclimb guides (#1930)
Update claude-api skill: Managed Agents `auto` permission policy and `ant beta:sessions connect` (#1750)
Update frontend-design skill to avoid generic design defaults (#1713)
Update claude-api skill: Claude Fable 5.1 / Mythos 5.1, Managed Agents updates, cost-optimize (#1704)
Rename claude-academy-guide skill to academy-guide and shorten its description (#1605)
A floor, not a guess: counts only commits whose author, co-author trailer, or message explicitly credits an AI tool (Claude, Copilot, Cursor, aider, Codex…). Based on 30 mainline commits. Unattributed AI code isn't counted here — the full audit estimates that separately.
