Fast, portable, non-Turing complete expression evaluation with gradual typing (Go)
The CEL Go implementation improved type-checking workflows this week with new error correction suggestions for functions, making it easier to catch and fix issues. On the internals front, the team tightened cost estimation accuracy, refactored value handling for ElemOf and KeyOf operations to…
Get this in your inbox every Monday →A deterministic 0–100 hygiene score — README, license, CI, tests, docs, and freshness.
Who ships this repo — author concentration and the bus factor across the last 300 mainline commits.
How welcoming this repo is to contributors — issue throughput, close time, responsiveness, and good-first-issue count.
What this project is built on — dependency count by ecosystem, the license mix, and anything worth a legal look before you adopt it.
Whether this project's CI can be trusted — pass rate, run times, flaky runs, and which workflow is the weak link.
Grounded in cel-go's README, structure, and recent commits — answers won't invent code they haven't seen.
A Monday email with what shipped, in plain English — no account needed.
Showing raw commit titles for the newest commits. Sign in to generate AI summaries.
Carry result sizes and selector paths through optional operations (#1525)
suggest: Type-check error correction suggestions for functions (#1500)
Ensure extension and validator factories are lazily initialized (#1502)
A floor, not a guess: counts only commits whose author, co-author trailer, or message explicitly credits an AI tool (Claude, Copilot, Cursor, aider, Codex…). Based on 30 mainline commits. Unattributed AI code isn't counted here — the full audit estimates that separately.