👾 nao is an open source analytics agent. (1) Create context with nao-core cli, (2) deploy nao chat interface for everyone
A deterministic 0–100 hygiene score — README, license, CI, tests, docs, and freshness.
Who ships this repo — author concentration and the bus factor across the last 300 mainline commits.
How welcoming this repo is to contributors — issue throughput, close time, responsiveness, and good-first-issue count.
What this project is built on — dependency count by ecosystem, the license mix, and anything worth a legal look before you adopt it.
Whether this project's CI can be trusted — pass rate, run times, flaky runs, and which workflow is the weak link.
Grounded in nao's README, structure, and recent commits — answers won't invent code they haven't seen.
A Monday email with what shipped, in plain English — no account needed.
Showing raw commit titles for the newest commits. Sign in to generate AI summaries.
feat(mcp) : support custom stories in `sub-agent` and `context-layer` mode (#1845)
feat(billing): only show the billing banner to admins when billing is bypassed (#1850)
feat(billing): add an organization flag to bypass Stripe billing checks (#1849)
fix(agent): show the answer when Claude writes it as a progress update before suggest_follow_ups (#1832)
feat(stories): refresh a live story in the background instead of blocking on its first cache (#1827)
A floor, not a guess: counts only commits whose author, co-author trailer, or message explicitly credits an AI tool (Claude, Copilot, Cursor, aider, Codex…). Based on 30 mainline commits. Unattributed AI code isn't counted here — the full audit estimates that separately.