Reading the repo — stats and the shipped feed land in about ten seconds…
This week focused on hardening the test suite and addressing cluster operational issues. Changes included fixing flaky monitoring and etcd recovery tests, improving cluster role binding cleanup, and allowing transient availability blips in the cluster version operator to reduce false failures.…
Get this in your inbox every Monday →A deterministic 0–100 hygiene score — README, license, CI, tests, docs, and freshness.
Who ships this repo — author concentration and the bus factor across the last 300 mainline commits.
How welcoming this repo is to contributors — issue throughput, close time, responsiveness, and good-first-issue count.
What this project is built on — dependency count by ecosystem, the license mix, and anything worth a legal look before you adopt it.
Whether this project's CI can be trusted — pass rate, run times, flaky runs, and which workflow is the weak link.
Grounded in origin's README, structure, and recent commits — answers won't invent code they haven't seen.
A Monday email with what shipped, in plain English — no account needed.
A floor, not a guess: counts only commits whose author, co-author trailer, or message explicitly credits an AI tool (Claude, Copilot, Cursor, aider, Codex…). Based on 30 mainline commits. Unattributed AI code isn't counted here — the full audit estimates that separately.
